S. V. Deshpande
World of Labour
India
Manifesto of the All-India Trade Union Congress
Source: The Labour Monthly, Vol. 12, March 1930, No. 3, pp. 187-189, (1,321
words)
Transcriptionp: Ted Crawford
Public Domain: Marxists Internet Archive (2009). You may freely copy,
distribute, display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and
commercial works. Please credit “Marxists Internet Archive” as your source.
The outstanding feature of the session of the All-India Trade Union Congress
held at Nagpur at the end of November and beginning of December last year was
the decision of a section of reformist leaders, on their defeat in the Executive
Council of the T.U.C., to secede from the A.I.T.U.C. and to establish a rival
body to be called the All-India Trade Union Federation.
The seceders obviously acted on their own initiative and without consulting the
trade unions which they were supposed to represent. The proceedings of the
conference of the seceders, which was held under the presidentship of Chamanlal
(a member of the Government Whitley Commission at present on tour in India
investigating labour conditions), clearly indicate the character of their move.
Resolutions were passed supporting the Whitley Commission, accepting the Round
Table Conference proposed by the Government and nominating delegates, for
confirmation by the Government, to the Geneva Conference of the International
Labour Office of the League of Nations. All these were resolutions which, the
A.I.T.U.C. had refused to pass. The seceders were faced with a choice between
working-class solidarity and co-operation with imperialism, and they chose the
latter.
The new General Secretary of the A.I.T.U.C., S. V. Deshpande, has issued the
following manifesto on the Nagpur session on behalf of the A.I.T.U.C. as an
answer of the militant working class to the splitting policy of the right-wing
leaders.
Manifesto on the Nagpur Session of the A.I.T.U.C.
The existence, life and growth of trade unions in India is of the most vital
importance to the Indian workers. To fight against the oppression of foreign
imperialists and our own capitalists, millowners and others, against miserable
wages, long hours, terrible housing conditions, to fight against starvation of
working-class families, Indian workers have just one means, and that is by
organising their ranks; building strong united organisations of the
working-class militant trade unions. Strong working-class organisations pursuing
militant class policy will be able to compel the millowners and other oppressors
to grant the demands of the workers.
The textile workers of Bombay suffered a temporary defeat because of the united
brutal efforts of Indian millowners and British imperialism, and also the fact
that the textile workers of Bombay stood alone without the assistance of other
textile centres. The jute workers of Bengal suffered defeat in their local
strikes because they were disorganised. The same is true about the railway
workers.
Strong trade unions are vital to the very existence of the working class, to the
success of their many struggles to better their conditions. And, in spite of
that, a section of the so-called leaders arranged a split at the last Trade
Union Congress at Nagpur.
These Right-Wing Leaders split away because the Trade Union Congress decided to
boycott the Whitley Commission. This every worker must remember and understand.
The task of the Whitley Commission appointed by British imperialism is to fool
the workers and help to stabilise and strengthen the exploitation of the
workers. This Commission, dominated by capitalists like the Bombay millowner,
Sir Victor Sassoon, who, by starvation plus brutal force, temporarily defeated
the textile workers of Bombay, is not going to help workers. Its sole purpose is
to help imperialism and the millowners and other capitalists. The workers will
not allow themselves to be fooled again by promises of the Imperialist
Commission into giving support to imperialism by participating in the
Commission. The workers can improve their lot only by fighting for freedom, for
independence, and by organising their own forces. This must be clear to every
rank and file worker.
The Trade Union Congress was correct in deciding to boycott this Commission and
taking a stand for militant struggle. And the Right-Wing leaders, lawyers and
bar-at-laws Chamanlal, Jothi, &c., who never suffered as the workers in the mill
suffered, joined the Whitley Commission, became members of it, thus betraying
the struggle for betterment of the conditions of Indian workers. The Right-Wing
leaders, who best represent the interests of millowners, were not content with
this betrayal and in order to weaken the Indian working class, which has now
become the leader and standard bearer of the struggle for Indian independence,
they decided to split the ranks of trade unions.
Every worker must remember this fact. The Right-Wing leaders split away in order
to weaken the economical and political struggle of the Indian workers. They
split away to help British imperialism and Indian capitalists. The Right-Wing
leaders had no mandate from the rank and file to split the trade union movement.
Considering themselves lords over the poor, ignorant workers, they thought it
was not necessary to ask the workers. The Right-Wing splitters decided to split
because they are against the militant struggle of the workers. They feel and see
the coming struggle of the workers in textile, jute, steel industries and on the
railways. They are anxious again to disorganise the struggle as they did in the
past. In order to weaken these struggles they have arranged this split. But the
jute workers of Bengal, the railwaymen and the textile workers of Bombay, Madras
and Ahmedabad understand their motives and will give a fitting answer by
strengthening their unions under militant leadership and organising themselves
for the coming struggle.
The Nagpur Session of the T.U.C. has shown again the necessity of developing
militant working-class leadership from the rank of the workers themselves, true
to the interest of the workers. The Right-Wing leaders, with the ease of
intellectuals caring only for their own ambitions, split the Trade Union
Congress. The intellectual reformist leaders betray the workers in every strike
and do their best to make the workers voluntary slaves of capitalism. The
reformist intellectual leaders use workers to make their own careers in
Assembly, at Geneva, &c., and now that the Indian proletariat and the Trade
Union Congress have given warning that they will put a stop to this, the
frightened assistants of the bourgeoisie are trying to preserve themselves as
parasites of the labour movement by precipitating the split. It is in vain. The
pygmies, Chamanlals, &c., cannot keep the giant Indian proletariat chained. True
militant genuine worker leadership is coming.
The Right-Wing leaders in their ambitions do not understand that the
class-consciousness of the Indian workers is growing. The time has come when
Indian workers are able to judge themselves and are able to put forward militant
leadership from their own ranks. The Right-Wing leaders do not understand the
historical significance of the past political labour demonstrations and the
struggle of textile workers of. Bombay. The Right-Wing leaders, anxious to give
voluntary police service to British imperialism by accusing the Left Wingers as
being “Moscow” Agents, are trying, by all means, to stop the forward movement of
the working class. It is in vain. Short-sighted reformists, assistants of
British, imperialism, your efforts are futile! The militant Indian working class
understands your machinations and judges you by your deeds. The textile workers
of Bombay repudiated Joshi and created a powerful textile union—the Girni Kamgar
Union—which you are slandering and condemning in chorus with British imperialism
and the millowners for its militant working-class stand. But the same fate
awaits the rest of the reformist leaders who are now trying to weaken and split
labour ranks. They will find themselves in the garbage can of history. The
militant Indian working class will triumph.
Our answer to this splitting policy of Right-Wing leaders, these self-appointed
defenders of British imperialism is:—
Down with the Right-Wing leaders, splitting and weakening the ranks; of Indian
workers!
Long live the unity of the Indian workers!
Long live the struggle for independence!
Down with the Whitley Commission!
Prepare for the struggles to improve the workers’ conditions!
Every worker into the union. Cent per cent. organisation in Indian working
class!
Forward to new militant genuine working-class leadership!
Stand by the Trade Union Congress!
S. V. DESHPANDE,
General Secretary.

Articles Of Interest:
Fire Risk Assessment | 3rd Party Liability Insurance | Advice About Debt | Accident And Injury Lawyer | Make Your Will | IVA UK Advice | Debt Programs | Dog Insurance UK | Payday Loan Debt | Car Insurance For A Day | Young Driver Insurance | Compensation For An Accident | Consolidation Companies | Debt Management Companies | Payday Loans For Bad Credit | Web Host Reviews | Multi Car Insurance |